What Claude sees
- The PRD. Claude reads the live requirements: scope, user stories, and acceptance criteria, so its plans and answers are grounded in what you are actually building.
- The research. Market and user findings are part of the context, so Claude reasons with the evidence behind the product instead of generic assumptions.
- The design. Flows and UI decisions are visible to Claude, keeping its suggestions consistent with the intended experience.
Why connect Claude
Teams reach for Claude to plan, spec, and reason through hard product decisions. The missing piece has always been context:- No copy-paste. No more pasting the PRD into a chat and re-explaining the product every session. The MCP connection lets Claude read the live context straight from ProductOS.
- Grounded reasoning. When Claude can see the requirements and the research, its output stops drifting. You get analysis and drafts that hold up against the actual product definition.
- Results flow back. MCP is bidirectional, so updates Claude makes are written back into the shared context where the rest of the pipeline can use them.
Connect in three steps
1
Open your ProductOS project
Choose the project you want Claude to reason over and open its integration settings to reveal the MCP connection.
2
Add the MCP server to Claude
Connect the ProductOS MCP endpoint in Claude’s connector settings and authorize it. Claude can now read your project as a live context source.
3
Reason over live context
Ask Claude to refine the spec, pressure-test a flow, or draft the next iteration.
What connected Claude is good at
- Refine the spec in place. Ask Claude to sharpen user stories or acceptance criteria and it edits against the real PRD, not a copy.
- Pressure-test decisions. Have Claude challenge a product choice using the research that is already in your project context.
- Plan the next iteration. Draft the roadmap for what comes next with Claude reasoning over where the product actually stands today.
Claude vs Cursor: which one?
Both integrations expose the same project context over the same protocol. The difference is where you work: Cursor is the editor, where the connected context steers code generation; Claude is where you plan, spec, and reason before and between builds. Many teams use both, and because they read one shared context, nothing diverges between them. See the Cursor integration.Whatever you produce with Claude connected remains yours. The code side of the pipeline syncs to your own repository through the GitHub integration.